🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is walking a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with the American leader asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, European countries employed their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in some form if talks resume.

The American leader in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He said the attacks started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always attempted to enforce their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and remains the ultimate solution to address disagreements, but its criteria, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a reply in the same language."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."