Skip to content
Saturday, October 17, 2026
Hub Finance Nation

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Shape Trump's Political Legacy - as well as the United States' Place in the World

Following launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the nation-building business.

In a notable news conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US military forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a group including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, orderly and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" entails is unclear, but the commitment marks an abrupt shift in direction for the president, full of inconsistencies and significant challenges.

A leader who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America first" international policy is now staking his presidency on effectively reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose governmental stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He promised to enlist American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, providing financing for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out sending American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has reshaped Venezuela's future – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is ready to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to past operations, which have mostly involved rockets and aircraft that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are markedly distinct.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Response at Home and Abroad

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra might prove tough for some of Trump's backers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his political base, was quick to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's endless use of force and support of overseas conflicts is understandable because we are compelled to finance it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and justified".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it ensured US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and resources that are central to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will raise larger questions in international relations, however, and impact American ties with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement voicing shock and condemning what it said was a reckless attack on a independent country.

During the Biden administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's choice not to consult with congressional leaders before initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "leak" details of the operation before the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That military operation was a triumph – with no American deaths and limited harm to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, effective and powerful demonstrations of American power and competency in American history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that success enduring, as the US says it will take over administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unclear. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while stabilising a region that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's international strategy has in store for them.

The writer

Timothy Phillips

Lena Vermeer is a financial analyst and blogger specializing in personal finance and investment strategies.

Hub Finance Nation

Type to search articles.